Interactive Tool

Identify Your Physical Climate
Risk Starting Point

This diagnostic helps sustainability, risk and compliance teams assess their CRIF readiness, identify their recommended PCRAM entry point, and get to disclosure outputs faster.

📄 Read the complete guide to PCRAM and CRIF methodology
Why This Matters

See where your programme stands - and which steps to tackle first


Physical climate risk assessment is nearly universal. Translating that assessment into financial figures, adaptation decisions and disclosure outputs is not. PCRAM closes the gap between knowing your exposure and doing something about it.

0%
of companies assess
physical climate risk
0%
have adaptation
measures in place
0%
disclose the
financial impact

Source: S&P Global Corporate Sustainability Assessment 2024

Step 1 of 2 — CRIF Self-Assessment

Where does your organisation stand today?


Mark where your organisation currently stands across each of the four CRIF components. Your responses will surface the right entry point from the options below.

CRIF Component Not Started In Progress In Place
Governance and Objectives
Physical Climate Risk Assessment
Adaptation Identification
Stakeholder Engagement
ℹ️ This is a starting point for internal discussion, not a formal audit or certification. CRIF is non-prescriptive and cyclical — your organisation revisits it as data matures and obligations update.
Step 2 of 2 — Your Starting Point

Which situation best describes your organisation?


Select the profile that best matches your current constraint. Each card shows the recommended PCRAM entry point and why.

📊

Data-rich, action-poor

Existing risk assessments in place, but no financial quantification yet
Start at Step 2: Quantify. Your hazard mapping is done. The gap is translating it into Expected Annual Loss figures your finance director will engage with. Step 1 data feeds directly into Step 2 without rework.

Disclosure deadline approaching

IFRS S2 or CSRD reporting required within 12 months
Start at Step 1: Screen, then Step 2 for your top sites. Run a portfolio-wide screen to establish coverage first, then apply financial quantification to the 20 to 40 highest-priority sites. Portfolio breadth satisfies disclosure; site depth satisfies auditors.
🏛️

Board alignment needed

Risk understood internally, but finance and the board are not yet engaged
Lead with Step 4 outputs, then build the programme behind them. The financial outputs — cost of inaction, adaptation NPV, insurer evidence pack — are what move boards. Produce those first, then work backwards to the full methodology.
🌱

No programme yet

No systematic physical risk assessment currently in place
Start at Step 1: Screen. You need to know which sites warrant closer attention before any other investment makes sense. A portfolio screen typically surfaces 200 to 400 priority sites from a large estate and gives you the baseline your governance process requires.

Want the full diagnostic questions for each step, the regulatory output mapping per step, and the detailed methodology behind each option? Read the complete PCRAM and CRIF guide.

PCRAM Quick Reference

What each step does and what it produces


Five steps from portfolio screening to continuous monitoring. Each step produces a specific output and satisfies specific disclosure requirements. This is a reference summary — for the full methodology and implementation guidance, see the complete guide.

Step What you do What it produces Disclosure output
1 Screen Rank your portfolio by hazard exposure across all sites Priority list of sites by risk type and severity TCFD Risk Mgmt IFRS S2 §10
2 Quantify Calculate Expected Annual Loss per site across event probabilities EAL per site; worst-case event cost in financial terms IFRS S2 Financials CSRD/ESRS E1
3 Identify options Map available adaptation measures with indicative costs and risk reduction Adaptation menu with NPV per option TCFD Strategy CSRD/ESRS E1
4 Build investment case Combine Steps 2 and 3 into board-ready financial documents Cost of inaction; adaptation NPV; insurer evidence pack IFRS S2 Effects CSRD Implications
5 Monitor Set site-specific alert thresholds and operational protocols Monitoring record; early warning capability; incident log TCFD Metrics IFRS S2 Ongoing CSRD Targets

What adaptation delivers: WRI analysis of 320 adaptation investments shows an average return of 27%, with 65% of benefits accruing regardless of whether a major weather event occurs. Sainsbury's avoided a £3m flood damage event across its 1,000+ site estate using the monitoring infrastructure built at Step 5.

$10.50
return per $1 invested
in adaptation
27%
average return across
adaptation investments
65%
of benefits accrue regardless
of weather events occurring

Source: World Resources Institute, analysis of 320 adaptation investments across 12 countries

Regulatory Alignment

How PCRAM maps to your disclosure obligations


Completing PCRAM is how you meet your disclosure obligations — not additional work alongside them. Each step produces the specific outputs IFRS S2, TCFD and CSRD require.

CRIF ComponentTCFD Pillar
Governance and ObjectivesGovernance
Physical Climate Risk Assessment (PCRAM)Risk Management
Adaptation IdentificationStrategy
Stakeholder EngagementMetrics and Targets

CSRD scope (post-Omnibus revision): The threshold is 1,000+ employees and €450m+ in turnover, covering approximately 6,000 of the largest EU undertakings. EFRAG's 2025 State of Play reports 98% of in-scope companies map ESRS E1 as material. Physical risk and adaptation requirements are retained in full.

Making the Internal Case

Handling the three most common internal objections


These are the objections sustainability and risk teams encounter most when building internal support for a PCRAM programme. Each one has a direct, data-backed response.

Having an assessment and having operationalised it are different things. S&P Global's data shows 92% of companies assess physical risk, but only 35% have a formal adaptation plan and only 17% disclose the financial impact. The assessment is the input for PCRAM — not a substitute for it. SmartResilience takes your existing assessment outputs and converts them into the financial figures and adaptation cases the assessment alone does not produce.

Data gaps at site level are the norm rather than the exception, and PCRAM is designed to work with what you have. SmartResilience uses pre-computed global hazard models to fill gaps in your site-level data, and the Step 1 screen identifies where higher-resolution data is genuinely critical versus where modelled data is sufficient for the level of analysis you need.

IFRS S2 is effective for reporting periods on or after 1 January 2024, and CSRD obligations for companies with 1,000+ employees and €450m+ in turnover are already live. Delaying typically means higher adaptation costs and a weaker negotiating position with insurers when you do engage. SmartResilience produces the TCFD and IFRS S2 outputs your current reporting period requires, while your longer-term programme develops in parallel.

This tool covers where to start. For the complete PCRAM and CRIF methodology — including step-by-step diagnostic questions, regulatory output mapping, and implementation guidance — read the full guide.

Read the complete guide →

Ready to move from
assessment to action?

SmartResilience automates portfolio screening, site-level financial quantification, ROI-ranked adaptation analysis and real-time early warnings — producing audit-ready outputs your disclosure obligations require.

Book a Free Demo

Or start with the methodology: read the complete PCRAM and CRIF guide

hp@smartresilience.com · smartresilience.com